Fringe Box

Socialize

Twitter

Tumbling Bay Footbridge: National Trust Says It Is ‘Committed to Finding a Resolution’

Published on: 5 Dec, 2024
Updated on: 8 Dec, 2024

The well-used towpath that crosses Tumbling Bay Weir has been closed since its dramatic collapse in November 2019.

By Martin Giles

Five years after the collapse of the River Wey towpath footbridge over Tumbling Bay Weir, there is still no confirmed plan for its repair. But the National Trust says it is “committed to finding a resolution.”

See also: What Movement Is There on Weir Repair?

The National Trust owns the River Wey Navigations, including the towpath that is on the part of the waterway that is known as the Godalming Navigation, but Guildford Borough Council, had, until at least the late 1980s, maintained the weir and shared the cost of its emergency temporary repair in 2020.

In 2023, talks between the Trust and GBC culminated in the National Trust accepting, it seemed with some reluctance, sole responsibility.

The weir bridge moments after its collapse in 2019.

In a short statement, GBC confirmed they had not formally discussed the matter since February 2023, adding: “All enquiries relating to the Tumbling Bay Weir should be directed to the National Trust.”

As well as a recreational facility, the towpath was a well-used off-road pedestrian and cyclist route into the town centre from the south, linking it to the North Downs Way.

Asked whether any progress had been made towards a repair, a National Trust spokesman said: “In 2019 the National Trust and Guildford Borough Council worked together and split the costs of the temporary weir repairs when it first collapsed.

“A further four years of talks to reach a shared approach for the Millbrook Weir and bridge permanent repairs concluded in late 2023, with the National Trust becoming the sole organisation taking the project forward.

“Ensuring equal access to green space, especially in an urban setting like Guildford, is a fundamental aim of the National Trust and we are committed to finding a resolution for the benefit of the local community.

“Throughout 2024, we commissioned a feasibility study, working with a local specialist engineering firm. Over the drier summer months, they conducted detailed geotechnical and structural investigations. We are now working through the study’s findings using that data to inform design proposals and potential options.

“The results of the feasibility work will help us to form a plan, including the timing of the project, which we expect to be an extended timeframe given various complexities, the consents needed and the significant cost in charitable funds.

“We understand the importance of the riverside walks that the Navigation offers to the community of Guildford, and the role that these areas play for wellbeing, socialising, exercise, leisure and just being out and enjoying nature, which is why, through external funding, we have been resurfacing and strengthening the towpath between the railway bridge opposite Dapdune Wharf to Walnut Bridge.”

A view of the relaid towpath from the town centre towards Ladymead

Cllr Tom Hunt

And speaking as a ward councillor, Tom Hunt (Lib Dem, St Nicolas) said: “I’m pleased that the National Trust has progressed the resolution of the Tumbling Bay bridge, and look forward to further progress in the future.

“Residents of St Nicolas ward (in which the weir is located) are keen to have the bridge restored, affording them and others uninterrupted enjoyment of the towpath.  I continue to offer my support to the National Trust to help them deliver a new bridge over the weir.”

 

 

Share This Post

Responses to Tumbling Bay Footbridge: National Trust Says It Is ‘Committed to Finding a Resolution’

  1. S Callanan Reply

    December 6, 2024 at 3:53 pm

    I’ve just walked along the newly resurfaced and strengthened towpath from the railway bridge opposite Dapdune Wharf to the station. Jolly good.

    Less good on the glacial pace in dealing with the problem at Tumbling Bay and, frankly, I’m offended by the quite unnecessary reminder that the cost will come out of “charitable funds”. Does the NT think we forget it’s a charity? The trust is always implying it’s impoverished while actually being a rather wealthy organisation.

    An estimate of the “extended timeframe” would be nice if it wouldn’t be too much trouble.

  2. Harry Elson Reply

    December 7, 2024 at 9:43 am

    What a shambles. The problem is that the pubic is completely impotent regarding any decisions made by the governing bodies. The people of Guildford have lost all faith in the ability to move forward on any projects without lengthy discussions and prevarication.

    I look with horror at the rising construction at the station. How has it come to this?

    As for the National Trust, its inability and unwillingness to restore Clandon Park to its former glory is disgraceful. At least I could cancel my membership, unlike Guildford Borough Council where I have to keep paying my Council Tax.

    I wonder what we will be saying in five years time.

  3. Tim Down Reply

    December 7, 2024 at 7:00 pm

    It’s a good job that the National Trust weren’t in charge in restoring Notre Dame cathedral in Paris.

  4. Paul Spooner Reply

    December 7, 2024 at 7:49 pm

    This is an embarrassment for all parties involved and perfectly demonstrates the failure of the Borough Council to facilitate resolution. The administration at GBC should be ashamed but all stakeholders have failed residents. Very sad.

    Paul Spooner is a former Conservative leader of Guildford Borough Council.

  5. Ian Tomes Reply

    December 9, 2024 at 9:42 pm

    And what is the local MP doing to bring pressure to bare? Surely there are grants which might assist or Section 106 monies from the huge Debenhams redevelopment which could be used to help the national trust speed up matters.

    Have they considered a local appeal for funds?

    Five years, with how many more to come?

Leave a Comment

Please see our comments policy. All comments are moderated and may take time to appear. Full names, or at least initial and surname, must be given.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *