By Martin Giles
Riverside Dapdune Wharf is an island of tranquillity in our town. Once a bustling centre of barge construction, it is now a quiet and pretty relic, beautifully maintained by the National Trust.
What a relief then for the trust and current visitors, enjoying the location’s semi rural feel, that the yellow plastic eyesore, an office block opposite, has disappeared. While it stood the best view of Dapdune Wharf was from the opposite bank with one’s back to the modern monstrosity.
It represented all that is the worst of the treatment of our riverside in Guildford. It might have been understandable for the Victorians, and those from earlier periods, to simply view the river as an industrial asset, a source of power to be exploited, but surely as we moved into the twentieth century there should have been more enlightened and imaginative views on how we could enjoy this natural amenity, aesthetically and for recreation.
The redevelopment of the site offered a chance to take a small step towards that goal. The ugly characterless office blocks could have been replaced with much needed housing that could have reflected the style of the Wharf cottages. They could have been pleasant to live in and enhanced the view.
Instead we are to see yet another office block emerge. It might not look as bad as the last one. It is hard to imagine that it could be. But it is unlikely to blend in, much less attract admiring glances.
We should not rush to condemn our local councillors and planning officers though. They are normally very constrained in their decisions. If an office block stood there before it is almost impossible to refuse an application to redevelop for a similar purpose.
And in all planning decisions is the threat of the Planning Inspectorate. From a range of nearly 200 miles they hang like the sword of Damocles over all our local planning decisions making them almost a matter of form, often to the puzzlement of both applicants and objectors who imagine councillors to have real discretion.
If this government really wants localism to blossom and save some money they could do a lot worse that shutting down this damaging agency. But of course they won’t because for all their fine words about devolving power downgrades they need the planning inspectorate to make sure that new houses, for an ever increasing population, are built and growth targets met, regardless of local sentiment.
There is no doubt this is a difficult problem and there is also no doubt that none of the main political parties really want to face up to it. I really hope that I am being too pessimistic, that our new local plan will be a template for consensual development that can open up our river as we all want.
I want to believe it but I can’t. The memory of one man from Bristol overriding a unanimous vision by our elected councillors over the development in Green Lane is still too fresh in my mind.
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
jim Allen
September 17, 2013 at 11:46 pm
As usual Martin hits the nail square on the head again……. Hopefully a sensible traffic plan and local plan reflecting the Neighbourhood plan survey findings will go some way to curb the Bristolians ambitions in Surrey.
Bibhas Neogi
September 21, 2013 at 9:18 am
Maybe it wasn’t possible before to change usage from office to residential. But now there is hope. For the future the Councils may take advantage of relaxation of planning rules as published by the Department for Communities and Local Government.
Relaxation of planning rules for change of
use from offices to residential
ISBN: 978-1-4098- 3890-6
May 2013
I quote from the above document,-
“Evidence Base (for summary sheets)
Problem under consideration
The Government is committed to increasing the rate of house-building, making housing supply more responsive to changes in demand.Seasonally adjusted housing starts are now 58% above the trough in March 2009 but are still 45% below the March quarter 2007 peak and housing completions are 42% below their March quarter 2007 peak . Annual housing supply in England amounted to 134,900 net additional dwellings in 2011 to 2012, an 11%
increase in net additional dwellings from 2010 to 2011 although the number of households in England is projected to grow by 221,000 per year In part this is due to wider market conditions, but the Government believes that aspects of the current land use planning system also play a part.
The Government is committed to a raft of reforms designed to address the chronic under supply of housing. It is therefore proposing to amend the planning rules to make it easier to change use from office to residential use.”