Fringe Box

Socialize

Twitter

Letter: Tolerance and Respect for the Law Are Essential During the Brexit Process

Published on: 5 Nov, 2016
Updated on: 5 Nov, 2016

EU & UK FlagsFrom Nils Christiansen

Conservative borough councillor for Holy Trinity ward

It’s time to say, ‘Enough!’

The EU referendum asked one simple question. Do we Leave or do we Remain in the EU? The answer was that we should Leave, and that is what we must do. Period.

The question was not whether we wanted to change our values or our constitution. In fact, both sides argued that these would be better protected if we voted their way.

In my opinion, what we are currently witnessing are disturbing challenges to the values and the constitution which together define much of what it means to be British.

Tolerance, freedom of speech and the rule of law can be uncomfortable bedfellows, but in Britain we have achieved a balance which is the envy of the world. It has taken many centuries of largely peaceful struggle to achieve this, but recent events show how easily it can be undermined.

Tolerance means accepting that others are different. The abuse heaped upon immigrants, people of colour and people of different faiths or sexual orientations is illegal and fundamentally un-British.

Being British is an identity which enables us to accept our underlying differences, such as being Scottish or English. Once this is undermined the underlying differences become more important, and our very nation of Great Britain loses its purpose as the custodian of ‘British-ness’.

Freedom of speech means allowing all sides to have their say. When intolerance is permitted, people become fearful of speaking their mind. In this way freedom of speech can be abused and undermined by populists who forcefully demand their views are heard, whilst turning a blind eye to their fellow travellers who bully and harass others into cowed silence.

Unfortunately significant parts of the press are complicit in this as they publish ever more inciting headlines like yesterday’s “Enemies of The People” and similar.

The rule of law is the glue which holds the delicate balance of our constitution together. Simply put, parliament passes the laws, judges enforce them. If the people don’t like their laws, they ask their elected politicians to change them in parliament.

Voters made a clear request in the EU Referendum that Parliament should now pass a law which get us out of the EU. The only thing that happened in the High Court on Thursday, was that judges pointed out that parliament should pass the law, not Theresa May and her cabinet.

It was a decision on process not politics and should remind everyone that this is how the British Constitution works. The disgraceful bullying of the judges who made this decision risks undermining the rule of law.

If the press and politicians cannot accept judges interpreting this law, which other laws should be ignored?

The current path is at best the route to a “nasty society” and at worst to tyranny. It is not good enough to call it ‘sturm und drang’ or quietly acquiesce. It is time for all politicians and civic leaders to say “Enough!”

The law and the independence of the judiciary will be respected. All voices will be heard, regardless of how much we disagree with their views.

And we will not accept any form of intolerance in our society. The alternative is mob rule and the undermining of what it means to be British.

Share This Post

Responses to Letter: Tolerance and Respect for the Law Are Essential During the Brexit Process

  1. Stuart Barnes Reply

    November 5, 2016 at 3:29 pm

    Voters did not make a “request” to Parliament to get us out of the hated and corrupt EU – they issued an instruction.

    If MPs ignore or try to obstruct that clear instruction it will be at the peril of their nice jobs.

  2. John Armstrong Reply

    November 5, 2016 at 4:54 pm

    I’m not quite sure just who the good councillor is accusing intolerance; the Remoaners for bringing the court action against the result of a perfectly legal and proper referendum; or the Brexiteers for being somewhat irritated at three europhile judges finding for the plaintiff?

    Some of us always suspected that we would never be allowed to leave the EU, even if we won a referendum. Around 90% of the judiciary are Europhiles, and one suspects that they were appointed for that reason, for just such an occasion as this. It’s what is known as downside plannin or, in this case, a stitch up.

    But let us see how the appeal goes. Let us see if the unelected judges in the Supreme Court trump all. Parliament, sovereignty, the royal prerogative; and the people.

    Tolerance? It can be overdone. Let’s face it, MP’s will not tolerate the electorate kicking over the traces.

  3. Jim Allen Reply

    November 6, 2016 at 12:01 am

    The moral indignation, the mortally offended tone from many Remainers and the implication, from some, that anyone who dares disagree with them is badly educated, surely is a sign of the electronic age rather than a loss of democracy.

    As for judges being balanced, I have personal knowledge of 11 judges. While approx 50% were fair and rational they are matched by some of the most obnoxious, self opinionated, disengaged people I have ever met. They are human as well and are far from perfect.

Leave a Comment

Please see our comments policy. All comments are moderated and may take time to appear.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *