Fringe Box

Socialize

Twitter

Mole Valley MP Drops Local Plan Bombshell By Suggesting Revision is Simple

Published on: 28 May, 2019
Updated on: 28 May, 2019

By Martin Giles

Guildford’s Local Plan can be changed without a judicial review, according to a letter Mole Valley Conservative MP Sir Paul Beresford has sent several GBC councillors.

Sir Paul Beresford MP

After criticising the “astonishing way [the Plan] was pushed through an emergency full council meeting during the purdah period just before the local elections”, Sir Paul says he has “sought and received, verbal assurances from the Department of Housing Communities and Local Government that GBC can bring about a reversal of this with a ‘Local Plan revision’ ”.

Sir Paul said this morning (May 28) that he had obtained only verbal advice from MHCLG because of the need to act quickly. He had spoken to a SPAD [Special Adviser] who had referred Sir Paul’s questions to a senior planning official while Sir Paul waited on the phone line.

He added: “GBC officials can check but they should know. If required, I could get it in writing but this will take time because of the Parliamentary recess.”

A copy of the letter understood to have been sent to some of the councillors at GBC. Despite the final paragraph, it seems that some councillors who did not vote for the Plan have not received the letter.

Sir Paul now intends to write to parish council chairs asking for support. He also hopes to encourage residents to write to their councillors urging them to take the action he is suggesting in the letter.

He added that he had sent the letter to those who are responsible and those [councillors] “we think voted against the Plan”. Recipients are believed to include the GBC council leader, Caroline Reeves (Lib Dem, Friary & St Nicolas), the lead councillor for planning, Jan Harwood (Lib Dem, Merrow) and the re-elected Planning Committee chair, Marsha Moseley (Con, Ash Vale) but several councillors who voted against the Plan have not, so far, received a copy, including Joss Bigmore who spoke passionately against adoption of the Plan in the council debate before he was elected.

Cllr Joss Bigmore

Today Cllr Bigmore, R4GV leader (Christchurch), said: “Obviously we will have to investigate whether what Sir Paul suggests is possible. We will be pushing for a meeting with him and the MHCLG to try to add some substance to the verbal assurances he has received.

“While this could be great news, it appears to run contrary to other advice about our available options, so we shouldn’t get too carried away.

“R4GV will always be cognisant of the Mole Valley [parliamentary constituency] area of Guildford Borough bearing a huge burden of housing development in the Local Plan. But this must always be viewed in the context of the borough’s needs as a whole and not as separate issues.”

Cllr Susan Parker

Susan Parker (GGG, Send) said none of the Guildford Greenbelt Group councillors had received the letter from Sir Paul. “Frankly, I’m shocked at it,” she added. “If a judicial review is successful, land can have green belt status restored fast.  A review can quash elements of the Local Plan, if there are legal errors.

“That can’t happen with revision. Councillors have been advised this could take at least two years, possibly longer, with no change to green belt status. Maybe do revision as well, definitely not instead.

“Sir Paul has written lobbying against judicial review. Why? I don’t think GBC should oppose judicial reviews from the Guildford Local Plan Challenge, Wisley, and Save Hog’s Back.”

Cllr Caroline Reeves, Guildford’s MP, Anne Milton and the Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government were all invited to comment.

This evening in a press release from Sir Paul headed “Mole Valley MP calls on newly elected Guildford Councillors to right the wrongs in the Local Plan” it is stated: “The Conservatives in the Mole Valley Constituency wards of Guildford Borough Council have spent years fighting against the damaging GBC Local Plan. Of particular concern are the proposals to take small rural villages in these wards out of the Green Belt, thereby allowing for development on what was previously Green Belt land.

“The site at the former Wisley Airfield is also marked for large scale, wholly inappropriate,
development. The campaign against these destructive plans has been led by Sir Paul Beresford, along with Conservative councillors and candidates from the Mole Valley wards of GBC.”

Share This Post

Responses to Mole Valley MP Drops Local Plan Bombshell By Suggesting Revision is Simple

  1. Richard Harvey Reply

    May 28, 2019 at 10:18 pm

    Why would you wish to halt the planned JRs? I agree, run them in conjunction

  2. Jan Lofthouse Reply

    May 29, 2019 at 8:52 am

    I say, save the green belt in Surrey and preserve our historic villages.

    • Garry Walton Reply

      May 29, 2019 at 3:58 pm

      And the historic buildings in those villages, for instance Ockham Parish Rooms, left to Ockham Village residents by Mary Countess of Lovelace, but now under threat from development. There is a public meeting, open to all, 12th June 2019 at 8pm Ockham Parish Rooms.

  3. Stuart Thompson Reply

    May 29, 2019 at 12:14 pm

    Sir Paul Beresford made such inadvisable and still unsubstantiated allegations of Russian collusion in the Wisley Airfield development that I am surprised that he is again intervening in Guildford local planning matters.

    Would he not be better occupied seeking the leadership of the Tory party?

  4. Jon Dobinson Reply

    May 29, 2019 at 2:30 pm

    Some of the replies and comments here seem to misinterpret Sir Paul. It’s plain when he mentions “the advantage of removing judicial review” he is not talking about ending this process now, merely pointing out that if the Local Plan can be revised so that it is a helpful rather than dangerous document, that is a win for all sides and judicial review would not then be needed.

    So revision is an additional option, not an alternative. I’m worried by the extraordinarily weak comment from the R4GV leader – this hardly sounds like someone who is prepared to defend Mole Valley’s green belt against development. Are they changing their colours now they’re in power? That would indeed be a blow.

    Jon Dobinson was the unsuccessful Conservative candidate for Lovelace ward in the May 2 borough council election.

  5. David Roberts Reply

    May 29, 2019 at 3:43 pm

    Yes – a very weak response from Cllr Bigmore. He already seems to be falling into the trap of seeing this as a town versus country issue, instead of recognising that overdeveloping the green belt means underdeveloping the town. There is no chance of imaginative town-centre redevelopment while developers can get green fields on a plate.

    Why doesn’t the council just JR itself? Section 31(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 permits this, and there are precedents.

  6. Lisa Wright Reply

    May 29, 2019 at 7:03 pm

    Sounds like Cllr Bigmore has been told something completely different from GBC officers, let’s hope the meeting with everyone will be fruitful.

  7. Paul Bishop Reply

    May 31, 2019 at 9:53 am

    The cynic in me thinks this is a Conservative MP trying to boost his local popularity in readiness for a possible general election, rather than someone genuinely trying to help. Otherwise, rather than writing a public letter to councillors it would have been more productive to involve the GBC Executive in any discussions he seems to have had.

    Editor’s note: The letter was not sent as an open letter it was obtained by The Guildford Dragon NEWS.

Leave a Comment

Please see our comments policy. All comments are moderated and may take time to appear.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *