Residents who live close to Guildford Cathedral and who oppose its plans to build on Stag Hill are querying the number of homes cited in a revised scheme.
Guildford Cathedral has formed a partnership with Hampshire-based housing association, Vivid, and will again be seeking planning permission. The cathedral’s previous plan, in partnership with Linden Homes, was refused by Guildford Borough Council in 2017.
The residents are concerned that, although a story on the revised plan by Get Surrey stated it will be for up to 100 homes, a report document by property consultants Foddy Consult commissioned by Guildford Cathedral and published on May 8, 2018, contains a line that states: “….the site capacity could be increased to say 134 dwellings”.
Guildford Cathedral’s director of operations, Matt O’Grady, has today (Tuesday, June 12), said: “We are quoting a figure of a minimum of 100 homes, 134 was the number in the previous scheme that was rejected by the council. This may change as we go through the process of consultation with the local residents, GBC and others.”
The cathedral’s press statement on the new proposal includes: “Vivid has significant expertise and experience in providing affordable housing as well as private residential homes and the housing association is an existing provider of affordable housing to Guildford Borough Council.
“This collaboration will enable Guildford Cathedral to engage with Guildford Borough Council and local residents to develop a sustainable mixed community on the site, and go some way to address the shortage of affordable housing in Guildford. Importantly, the scheme will also provide a financial endowment to help fund the cathedral’s long term repairs and maintenance.”
The Very Revd Dianna Gwilliams, Dean of Guildford, said, “We are delighted to have Vivid alongside us as we take the project forward. The cathedral, with Vivid, will engage with our local community and Guildford Borough Council seeking to build on all the comments and concerns expressed last year.”
In an email to The Guildford Dragon NEWS, residents Naomi and Richard Vary, have noted their concerns: “First, the cathedral has publicly indicated that it has teamed up with Vivid to build a ‘modest’ development of up to 100 properties.
“The cathedral indicates that lessons have been learned from the last application, and promises a proper consultation and a site which is not as bulky as the last proposal. There is no mention of details, such as whether it will be accessible from the cathedral, or whether traffic will still be routed through the narrow residential streets.
“Obviously, proper comment on any plan will have to wait until we see the plans, and take part in the consultation, but on its face a reduction from 134 to 100 properties does little to reduce the harm caused by the proposals.
“The dean talks about building a ‘community’, but a community is more than a collection of houses. Communities need schools, healthcare and other infrastructure. The previous application accepted, for example, that it would overload local schools, displacing local children into schools in other towns.
“A small reduction in the number of properties will not solve this issue. If anything, the traffic, school and congestion issues have become worse since the last application because the approval of the Guildford Park and Solum developments mean that problems caused by overburdened infrastructure in this small corner of Guildford will be even greater than previously envisaged.
“Secondly, and of more pressing concern, is the cathedral’s apparent attempt to use the inspector’s review of the Local Plan as a back door attempt to revive the planning application which was rejected in 2017?
“The cathedral did not appeal that decision, and it is very worrying to see that, by way of the May 2018 Foddy Consult document, the cathedral is lobbying the inspector to increase the site allocation to 134 properties on the basis that the Linden Homes application demonstrated how this number of properties could ‘sensitively’ be accommodated on the site.
“The Foddy Consult document relies heavily on the planning officer’s report, despite the numerous flaws in that report and the fact that the vast majority of council members voted against the planning officer’s recommendations. To present that report to the inspector (who will not have had the benefit of reviewing all of the material associated with the application) as a statement of the accepted truth runs the risk of being highly misleading.
“It is also very difficult to see how the dean’s public statements regarding the new plans for only 100 homes and a less bulky development can be reconciled with this apparent attempt to revive the previous 134-home, high-density, high-visual impact application. It would be good to hear her comments on this.
“As a final comment, we appreciate that the discussions on the Local Plan are at present focussing on whether the site allocation should be increased, but are concerned that the debate will become one of 100 properties versus 134.
“The question should instead be whether the site can and should accommodate any development and, if so, at what level, and whether the application can be properly justified when all relevant factors are considered.”
The cathedral’s press release adds: “Vivid is Hampshire’s largest provider of affordable homes with around 70,000 customers and 30,000 homes in the South East, mainly across Hampshire, Surrey and Berkshire. Vivid has around 850 staff including their own repairs team.”
Get Surrey reported that Vivid will begin consulting with residents this autumn before submitting a formal planning application.
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Roy Connor
June 13, 2018 at 11:05 am
A well written article with some very interesting points that will have to be addressed.
Let’s hope the dean is more approachable than last time and more open to the so called community she speaks of.
Helena Townsend
June 13, 2018 at 12:33 pm
The planning committee refused the previous Linden Homes application on the basis it was out of character of the area, the development was of a poor quality, it would cause substantial harm to the cathedral building and it would have a negative impact on long views of the cathedral from key locations in Guildford.
So why did they lead locals to think this was the end of it when they publicly included it on their list of brownfield sites.
I have always said that this site should be developed, but now the cathedral is in bed with a housing association which specialises in affordable homes.
The residents are right to be concerned as I doubt this new scheme will do anything to lift this area which is in decline. Linden at least construct a premium product.
Esther Parry
June 13, 2018 at 12:53 pm
This highlights the disparity between dwelling numbers as the Surrey Advertiser / Get Surrey press release [story] states “up to 100 homes”, yet we can see this is not the case.
Martin Elliott
June 13, 2018 at 5:25 pm
Does the latest proposal address, or ignore again, the status of the 8.9 hectares purchased by Lord Bennet as a memorial for the Canadian Armed Forces?
Whilst there is a memorial stone at the cathedral, the claim during the previous scheme was that is wasn’t registered as a war memorial so could be built upon.
Sounds as if Lord Bennet’s purchase will again be left only as a stone under this development.
Stuart Barnes
June 17, 2018 at 3:41 pm
The whole idea is a disgrace. Previously I have supported the cathedral in its money raising efforts, but if this scheme goes ahead then they will not receive any further support from me.