Abraham Lincoln
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis...
Guildford news...
for Guildford people, brought to you by Guildford reporters - Guildford's own news service
In response to: Guildford ‘Strategic Sites’ Riddle After Whitehall Abandons Plans to Widen A3
Now that the A3 widening is going to be shelved for the third time, funding for infrastructure from the central government could be scarce for a long time.
So the councils should try to improve the network wherever possible, using low-cost solutions, and also explore private investment for tolled routes.
I have constructed rather a long list of possibilities I hope may be useful for our planners.
1. Stoke Road /A25 junction.
To improve the flows between the A3, A320 and A25, explore the following:
All the above would reduce the number of phases at this junction and allow more time on the remaining ones.
2. Relocation of the bus station
On the southbound Onslow Street, move the bus lane from the nearside to the offside lane and take it across over the median on the closed stretch of offside northbound lane (see Item 4 below) and enable right-turn into Bedford Road.
3. Short-term alterations to the gyratory
4. Urgently safeguard a new east-west crossing
Safeguard a new east-west crossing between Guildford Park Road and Woodbridge Road through Jewson’s Yard site to connect with Leas Road, now that Solum site blocks the more direct route as, for example, suggested by GVG.
As part of this, create a two-lane one-way loop from Woodbridge Road, to Mary Road and Leas Road.
5. Investigate business case for a tolled tunnel
To reduce town-centre through traffic, investigate the business case for a tolled tunnel from the A281 Shalford to the A25 Stoke Park with spur connections to the A3100 at Artington and the A248 at Broadbridge.
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Charles King
June 29, 2020 at 12:33 pm
Bibhas Neogi forgot to mention the “Pie in the Sky Roundabout” which would allow all traffic to disappear up its rear bumper.
In reality, all these proposals might have merit but would just set up endless debates, when the right way is to get the government to change its mind. It is not to difficult these days, give Boris Johnson a push and he falls over.
Colin Cross
June 29, 2020 at 2:00 pm
We can forget the A3 tunnel. It would be too expensive and too laborious.
Why not try what they do in a large number of other countries and build an identical flyover on top of the existing A3 Guildford flyover?
The current road, with all its slip roads, can remain in use for all local traffic that wants to enter and exit the town and the new “over-flyover” is used solely for through traffic only, joining it at suitable locations north and south of the town.
A rough estimate is that this would approximately halve the current traffic volume as it spreads it across the two options.
No doubt there are some problems with this but similar solutions can be seen working work elsewhere in the world. It would be cheaper and quicker than a tunnel and could have minimal disruption and adverse impact upon the town overall.
Bibhas Neogi
July 6, 2020 at 10:25 am
My previous comment was probably too long to post, so I’ll say it very briefly again. Cllr Cross should read ‘Affordable tunnel’ discussions on GDN here https://guildford-dragon.com/2013/10/12/letter-ideas-affordable-road-tunnels/ and the very last comment made by me.