Surrey County Council Scraps Plans For Another ‘Posh’ Farnham Castle Awayday

Published on: 7 Feb, 2013
Updated on: 7 Feb, 2013

Farnham Castle – Photo Geoff Roberts (www.amazing-weddings.co.uk)

Liberal Democrats on Surrey County Council have welcomed the formal announcement that following the pressure they have brought to bear on the county council’s Tory Cabinet a future overnight stay at Farnham Castle has been cancelled.

Call for all foreign trips to be cut

However, following further answers to questions from the Liberal Democrat’s Leader of the Opposition, they are now calling on the Conservative Cabinet to cut overseas trips at council taxpayers’ expense.

Cllr Hazel Watson said: “It has been revealed that there were at least eleven trips overseas by Conservative Cabinet members in 2011-12 at council taxpayers’ expense. The cost of these, including in some cases council staff accompanying cabinet members, totalled at least £8,500. The total costs could be more as the county council does not maintain centrally a list of all trips by county councillors.

“Surrey’s residents should be told why it needed two Conservative Cabinet members to go on a trip to China, why one Cabinet member had to make six overseas trips and why none of these trips resulted in reports back to Surrey County Council by the Conservative Cabinet members involved.

“Just as the Conservative Cabinet councillors have cut their stays in a posh castle, they need to stop swanning off on unnecessary overseas trips at a time when Surrey residents are facing a 1.99% council tax increase.”

Surrey County Councillor for Guildford West, Fiona White, said: “It was wrong for Surrey to use Farnham Castle for their ‘bonding session’.  It would have cost less to use local authority owned buildings.

‘In times when we are all having to tighten our belts, councils have a responsibility to save money where they can.  Trips abroad can be helpful but the benefits need to be clearly established before the trip takes place. Such trips should be rare and limited only to those who need to go.

‘There needs to be a robust central record of such trips, their cost and the benefits so that members of the public can see why taxpayers’ money is being spent that way. Also, there must be a reporting back procedure so that residents can see that they are getting value for money.”

Share This Post