By Emily Dalton
local democracy reporter
A school is set to shut for good, a council has confirmed due to plummeting numbers of children living in the county.
The continuing drop in Surrey’s birth rate has been blamed for the closure of St Mary’s C of E Infant School in Shackleford, six miles south-west of Guildford. A rural hamlet, also crowned Surrey’s poshest village, Shackleford has a tiny population compared to its more urban neighbouring towns.
Surrey County Council said “significant” changes to the population had forced the decision, adding that Brexit, the cost-of-living crisis and the pandemic had contributed to “families leaving Surrey”.
The new lead for children services, Cllr Jonathan Hulley, said: “It isn’t an easy decision to make. No one wants to be responsible for closing any school anywhere.” But Cllr Hulley agreed to give notice that St Mary’s will close.
Matt Furniss, councillor for Pilgrims division which includes Shackleford, called it a “sad proposal” but that it “reflects a growing situation in our rural schools”. He explained the school currently has only 30 students out of 90 places.
“The final nail in the coffin was a maximum of six pupils putting down the Shackleford school as their first choice for September 2025,” he added.
The council and the Guildford Diocese and the governing body of the school had been working together to keep the school going by entering a federation with St James C of E VA Primary School so it can share resources.
However, the Surrey council said the school is “no longer viable” or financially sustainable given the small number of pupils joining the infant school. Council documents said, if the school stays open: “The number of children on roll will be so low that the school cannot continue without putting the quality of education for the children at risk.”
Surrey is facing a stark challenge from falling enrolments, with nearly 1,700 fewer children going to primary school compared to eight years ago. Schools receive money from the central government based on the number of pupils they have on their roll. High vacancies in schools mean there is less money for staff, resources, equipment, extracurricular activities, to pay bills and to carry out maintenance work.
In October 2021, St Mary’s school had 81 pupils on roll and by October 2024 that had fallen to 44 – a decrease of 46 per cent. Whilst there may be close historical ties to the school in the local community, the council claims only two per cent of children educated at St Mary’s live in Shackleford itself. The number of children living in the immediate vicinity of the school is no longer able to fill or sustain the rolls of the school.
The county has put forward plans for children at St Mary’s infant school to be automatically transferred to Puttenham C of E Infant school for September 2025. Parents do not need to apply for a place.
A report said: “It is appreciated that proposals of this nature are not popular and are met with a great deal of emotion as ties to the school can span generations. The council, diocese and school leaders would not be proposing this way forward if there were any other alternative.”
Cllr Hulley agreed to Cllr Furniss’ request to consider keeping the school building to be used for community and educational purposes in the village.
Click on cartoon for Dragon story: Public Asked for Views on SCC’s Proposal for Reduced Speed Limits
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Nigel Keane
May 30, 2025 at 1:33 pm
We are told that there are insufficient places for SEND Children in Surrey, so why not convert the school at Shackleford into a specialised educational needs school? This would ensure that it does not get lost from the system. The children could be bussed in each day so there would not need to be too many extra cars in the village.
Kathryn Moore
June 1, 2025 at 4:37 pm
Yes. Exactly what I thought. But then I thought the developers will come. Offering lots of money to provide affordable houses. But of course they won’t actually be affordable. Maybe one. So yes to SEND school. You needs lots of people to back it but here are actually hundreds that would do do just that.