A new road layout for central Guildford, allowing more pedestrianisation and the creation of open spaces within the town centre and by the river, was at the core of a new plan presented by Guildford Vision Group (GVG) this week.
The main presentation, to an almost full Baptist Millmead Centre, on Wednesday, February 1, that seats around 500, was given by architect David Leonard of Leonard Design Architects. Visual presentation of how a redeveloped Guildford could look culminated in a virtual “fly through” (see below).
In a show of hands at the end of the meeting, there was almost unanimous agreement that Guildford Borough Council (GBC) should adopt the ambitious goals of the £2 billion scheme. There appeared to be a similar level of support for a new rail/river crossing, critical to the proposed layout.
Central to GVG’s plan is creating a new east-west crossing, linking York Road with Guildford Park Road. The new link is central to deliver the objective of taking traffic away from the town centre, allowing much more of the centre, including the riverside and the railway station approach, to be better pedestrianised.
The plan would also deliver five new squares, two acres of open space, and 1,500 metres of revitalised riverside around a redeveloped Town Wharf.
John Rigg, GVG chairman, said: “The plan is a bold one, it’s ambitious. The new bridge, for instance, delivers huge benefits. At a stroke, it tackles the considerable infrastructure deficit in the town centre. That’s something the council, so far, are not planning to do in their Town Centre Regeneration Strategy, launched just days before our publicised event. We say Guildford needs determined, planned regeneration that addresses the infrastructure deficit of decades.
The GVG plan delivers significant development for the town. It creates nearly 3,000 new homes plus commercial, leisure and retail opportunities. In turn, GVG claims, this would result in a considerable increase in business rates and council tax revenues for the local authorities, as well as more employment opportunities from new businesses and activities.
According to a GVG press release: “The plan area is mostly away from the historic core and poses little threat to the town’s heritage. It respects Guildford’s well-loved setting and views. Indeed we claim that our plan brings much need investment to tired areas which have unexciting mixed use, along with unappealing design and architecture.
“These areas are occupied mostly by ageing government buildings and surface car parks. Network Rail also could frustrate the £2 bn regeneration project if it is not open to cooperation with the town.”
To date, councillors have been sceptical about the prospect of a new bridge spanning a live railway on the grounds of cost and practicality but John Rigg said that the Vision Group had spoken to Network Rail who had confirmed that utilising modern techniques the installation of a new bridge was possible and that they would have no objection.
Mr Rigg went on to explain that GVG had also spoken to all the current owners or occupants of the land required, including the law courts and the police station who agreed that their current buildings were already becoming inadequate for current needs, new premises would probably be required, so they were not necessarily set on staying put.
The National Trust, which owns the River Wey Navigation, could also foresee no reason that would make it object to the proposed plan.
The next crucial stage will be the council’s reaction to GVG’s proposals. The relationship between the council and the group has fluctuated over the last five years. It was the GVG that successfully challenged a draft Local Plan when Cllr Tony Rooth was leader of the council.
A coup was soon mounted by Stephen Mansbridge who took control of GBC and his relations with the group gradually improved until they became quite close. Some felt too close but it was in this period that GBC accepted, for the first time the need for masterplanning, or a holistic approach.
But more recently, with Paul Spooner as the new council leader, there seems to be more distance but continuing dialogue and recent meetings have taken place. It is likely that the reception given to the GVG’s plan will strengthen, to some extent, their position in talks with the council.
But some councillors are known to be resistant to any move that could indicate that their control, as elected representatives, over town planning has been weakened and GVG will need to tread carefully.
Numerous councillors were in the audience at the meeting including: Matt Furniss, deputy leader and lead councillor for infrastructure; Geoff Davis, lead councillor for asset management; Nikki Nelson-Smith, lead councillor for culture and the arts; but absent was Paul Spooner who carries the planning brief in addition to his leadership role.
Cllr Caroline Reeves (Lib Dem, Friary & St Nicolas) whose ward includes most areas that would be affected by the proposals, commented: “I welcome the ideas put forward by the Guildford Vision Group for the town centre and I know that these along with many other suggestions are being studied by the major projects team in planning.
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Guy Sutlieff
February 3, 2017 at 1:31 pm
It all looks rather lovely in a dreamy sort of way, and I suppose this is all rather hypothetical as I imagine it will never happen. But two things spring to mind immediately.
Firstly, I’m amazed by all those low rise colonnaded buildings that are going to be built, seemingly replacing the entirety of Guildford town centre. Who, what, when & how are my misgivings here.
Secondly, and more importantly I think, is concerning this obsession with huge pedestrian plazas, squares and streets. Now I have no wish to spend my time in fume filled, streets surrounded by cars, but all these lovely pedestrianised areas are always portrayed on a sunny, Saturday evening in summer when everybody is out doing lovely “Mediterranean Café Culture” type things. However, as experience has taught in many towns planned in the 60s and 70s with pedestrianised areas, what you get for the vast majority of the year in our climate are large windswept areas that ordinary people don’t frequent, which often leads to anti-social behaviour which leads to a bit of a spiral.
I think you need some traffic (in the widest sense of the word) just to have some throughput of people, which gives some atmosphere and security.
Carole Davis
February 4, 2017 at 2:30 pm
It all seems very interesting. It addresses the issues explanation of how: short term development, traffic congestion, and the need to build more houses in the area. But, as I’ve mentioned before, what are the plans for the fast flowing river Wey through Guildford centre and the risk of flooding?
The need for improved flood protection was mentioned during the presentation. Ed