A Guildford pothole
By Martin Giles
£8.3 billion, redirected from HS2 funding, is to be used to make driving smoother and safer for road users across Surrey and the rest of the country’s 30+ upper-tier local authorities. Surrey’s share is expected to be £82.4 million for its roads, some of the most heavily used in the UK.
Mark Harper MP
Transport Secretary Mark Harper and Richard Holden, the Conservative party chairman, met Guildford’s MP Angela Richardson at Surrey Highways and announced an unprecedented package of measures to resurface, mend and improve roads.
Ms Richardson said she was delighted to welcome the significant funding uplift for local road improvements and Mark Harper described the announcement as a “victory for all road users”.
The long-term plan to fix roads could help drivers save on repairs of damage caused by potholes, which is sometimes claimed back from the county council. It is claimed that the extra funding could help resurface 5,000 miles of road.
Angela Richardson MP
Angela Richardson said: “I was delighted that the Transport Secretary and the Conservative Party Chairman visited Guildford this week and have announced unprecedented measures to eliminate potholes and boost the confidence of drivers and cyclists.
“It is fantastic that this funding will give local authorities certainty and significantly support the effort to prevent new potholes from surfacing.
But local Liberal Democrats were dismissive. A spokesperson said: “Under the Conservatives, Surrey has consistently been named as the pothole capital of the UK. With that appalling recent record, it’s difficult to believe anything the Conservatives say about improving our highways.”
Guildford Labour was more optimistic: “We are really pleased that the Tory County Council will finally be able to fix some of the dreadful potholes on Surrey’s roads.”
But they asked: “Just wondering if this is where the spare levelling up money was meant to go when HS2 was cancelled? We’d be pleased to understand how that judgement call was made.”
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Anthony Mallard
November 20, 2023 at 4:22 pm
This is excellent news but only if the Surrey County Council (SCC) contractor’s work is properly supervised to ensure it is of an acceptable quality and capable of a long term repair, otherwise the money spent will be wasted.
Martin Elliott
November 20, 2023 at 4:31 pm
Why is this article, party politics propaganda, missing so much basic information.
As with so many press release based articles, the announcement is just an amount of money. Is this an addition to the annual grant to the SCC for repairs, or for improvements, or flawed schemes of Active Travel like London Road.
Where is the standing costs related to the problem. Like the SCC estimate of how long, how much work, to produce a defect free road system in Surrey. With present availability of contractor resources, how long would it take?
I’d suggest we are looking at far more than five years and this ‘extra’ is under five per cent of the needed funds.
John Lomas
November 21, 2023 at 12:18 am
Since when did Surrey migrate to The North? I could have sworn I heard a politician saying that the HS2 moneys saved would be spent in The North doing all the cross country and other access improvements needed.
Graham Cole
November 22, 2023 at 4:17 pm
With all of the incompetence surrounding the implementation of HS2, I’d forgotten where the HS2 money had come from. On reflection, I think it may have come from taxes. This would means that £82m of taxes will go to Surrey roads. Of course, a lot of other tax money has been lost through incompetent governance.
Roger Carnegie
November 23, 2023 at 12:43 pm
The SCC highways budgets are around £160 million per annum. This covers more than just roads, but roads take up the lion’s share.
£82 million is a welcome amount but isn’t really going to do much once spread out over the counties 3,000 miles of road.
I’d welcome the additional money spent on footpath maintenance and would have much preferred it if we could have just built a new railway line as then we’d have something to show for the money.