By David Reading
The new road bridge over the railway line at Ash is to be named Chester Bridge – suggested by the winners of a competition run by Guildford Borough Council.
The council asked local residents to come up with a name for the new bridge, taking into account the history of the area, the environment and the community when making their suggestions. The bridge is due to open on November 23.
More than 400 people submitted names, which were considered by a panel of local residents. The panel included historians, students from Ash Manor School, a former borough and parish councillor and a member of the local Scout group.
Chester Bridge was suggested by both Andrew Reid and Beverley Jennings, with reference to the old Chester Arms pub. It was situated near the station and named after the Chester family, who lived nearby in Poyle Park.
The most well-known was Dr Henry Morris Chester, who was a major benefactor in the area in the 19th century and is said to have been an early advocate for a bridge over the railway line.
The council reports that that in 1895, Dr Chester wrote to the old Farnham Rural District Council stating that a bridge over the railway at Ash was a much-needed improvement, “instead of the present obstructive and dangerous level crossing”.
Dr Chester gifted the land for Ash Victoria Hall and then presented the clock and turret for the hall in memory of his mother. He left a legacy for the maintenance of the Victoria Hall clock, which became the Victoria Hall Clock Trust Fund.
Dr Chester also funded the wooden bell tower and its tubular bells at Tongham Church, the clock on the tower at St Peter’s Church and the organ and stained-glass windows in Cemetery Chapel.
GBC’s Lead Councillor for Regeneration, Cllr Tom Hunt, said: “I’d like to thank everyone who entered the competition to name the bridge. It’s great that we’ve had this opportunity to give our residents a voice.
“Dr Chester was certainly a generous benefactor and worthy of commemoration. It’s also fitting that he appears to have been one of the first advocates for a bridge over the railway at Ash. I’d also like to thank the judges for their time and invaluable local knowledge.”
The competition judges were:
Colin Bexley, Project Manager for VolkerFitzpatrick, the contractors, said: “We had a really interesting morning at our site office discussing the names that were suggested. I was delighted to meet the panel of judges, who had a wealth of knowledge about Ash and its history.”
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Paul Spooner
October 23, 2024 at 8:21 am
I am very pleased to see this project being completed under a different administration to the one that commissioned the project. I look forward to seeing the bridge operational and trust that other interventions, originally planned alongside the bridge, will be delivered to optimise and protect traffic flow in and around Ash.
Paul Spooner is a former Conservative leader of Guildford borough Council
Olly Azad
October 23, 2024 at 4:20 pm
Congratulations on the highly awaited opening and naming of the new road bridge at Ash. I know that numerous names had been put forward by Dragon readers, myself included, employing a sense of humour.
On reflection though, it makes complete sense for the structure to be named as Chester Bridge with its close association to the Chester family, in particular Dr Henry Morris Chester. A creative piece of thinking by both Andrew Reid and Beverley Jennings.
Who knows, there might even be a Roman Fort and a well crafted amphitheatre nearby, as is the case in the walled city of historical Chester bordering England and Wales?
Jim Allen
October 24, 2024 at 10:28 am
Never heard of the ‘Chesters’ but always remember the direction, “Go down to the “Dover Arms” and turn left over the level crossing…”
The Dover Arms was a landmark known by many travellers in past centuries.
Peta Malthouse
October 24, 2024 at 6:52 pm
I understand the newly constructed roundabout to the immediate west of the bridge has used the land on which the old footpath ran and there is no room to replace it. The footpath was the pedestrian access to the station from Foremans Road direction. Surrey County Council say they have no more land upon which to put a footpath, the adjacent plot being owned by the developers.
Why wasn’t this foreseen? It should have been relatively easy to reach a S106 agreement with the developer when planning permission was granted. What are the affected pensioners and others to do now?
Ash Station is a route centre. Once again we have made it easier for cars and ignored the locals.