Guildford Borough Council has announced that it will not be seeking a judicial review into a planning inspector’s decision to allow the redevelopment scheme at Guildford railway station.
The proposed development has been dubbed ‘the great wall of Guildford’, and has had many critics among local people.
In a statement, the leader of Guildford Borough Council, Cllr Paul Spooner, said: “Last month’s unfortunate appeal decision by the planning inspector to allow the Solum scheme was extremely disappointing for us and our whole community.
“The council’s planning committee had unanimously refused permission for the scheme and alongside poor design and little gain for railway station users, it undermined our aim for more affordable housing in the town centre.
“As promised at the time, we have now considered all options open to us regarding this depressing decision.
“The council cannot lodge an appeal to try and overturn the planning inspector’s decision and the government cannot ‘call-in’ a planning appeal decision after it has been made, so we explored the possibility of a judicial review about the process.
“Following professional internal legal advice, and expert QC opinion, it is clear that this is not a feasible option as there are no substantial grounds. To avoid using public money when there is no chance of a successful outcome, we have therefore decided not to ask for a judicial review.
“Although we cannot take any legal action, we want the best final outcome possible and will do all we can to make sure the least damaging scheme is developed. This includes helping to shape and improve the proposed design as it goes through the next planning stages. We will also continue our work with Network Rail and other partners to provide the supporting infrastructure vital to our borough’s future.”
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
David Croft
March 1, 2018 at 1:12 pm
How about negotiating with Solum to increase the % of affordable provided in exchange for waiving the proposed council SANG fee of £2.8 million?
This would help towards easing the council’s housing needs list and would and would stop £2.8 million pounds going to complete waste.
As Cllr Furniss would say, “Surely that’s a Win-Win?”