Abraham Lincoln
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis...
Guildford news...
for Guildford people, brought to you by Guildford reporters - Guildford's own news service
By Chris Caulfield
local democracy reporter
Formal protests have been lodged against Surrey Policeâs use of facial recognition technology that scans the faces of every adult and child in view of their cameras to identify known suspects.
Surrey Police was given two live facial recognition vans from the Home Office in November and has since put them to use in Redhill and Woking.
See also: Surrey Police To Use Facial Recognition To Detect Suspects
The surveillance cameras record the images of everyone who walks across their paths to see if they are a match of people on their watchlist.
The force says it deletes anybody who does not match to âminimise the impact on their human rightsâ with watchlist images deleted within 24 hours.
The police said there were known issues in the past with facial recognition technology including potential gender and ethnic bias but that developments and new AI driven algorithms have reduced this.
Now, a group of 25 cross-party Woking Borough Councillors have written to the force demanding the cameras are mothballed until meaningful consultation with residents and their elected representatives takes place over how, or whether, they are used.
The letter says that fundamental questions of governance and human rights should have been resolved before any decision was made â including accountability for wrongful stops or arrests from misidentification, whether cameras record continuously or selectively, and how and when data is processed, shared, stored, and deleted.
A resolution has also been passed by Woking Borough Councilâs Communities and Housing Scrutiny Committee calling on Surrey Police and the Crime Commissioner to join its January 20 meeting to answer questions about the use live facial recognition cameras in Woking.
In the meantime they want the cameras usage suspended immediately, pending full consultation with residents, with a focus on young people and those from ethnic minority backgrounds and community groups â as well as a full independently led equality and human rights impact assessment.
Chairing the committee on Tuesday, December 2, was Cllr Tom Bonsundy-OâBryan (Lib Dem, Hoe Valley). He said: âThey were deployed in Woking on November 26 and in Redhill on November 13. They scanned the faces of more than 8,000 members of the public; 99.9 per cent of those scanned were not arrested.
âOf the individuals explicitly flagged as alerts by the technology in Redhill, 60 per cent were ultimately not arrested, only two arrests were made.
âThere are serious questions about the proportionality of this. Imagine the police standing down the road, and asking to see everyoneâs passport, checking their ID, just in case they are a criminal.
âIt would be a ludicrous thing, we wouldnât stand for it, it would be outrageous, and that is effectively what this technology is doing. It scans the face of anyone, child or adult walking down the street and comparing it to a watch list.
âEveryone wants the police to stop criminals, to find and arrest the people responsible for crime, but is this technology really proportionate in being deployed here in Woking?â
A spokesperson for Surrey Police said: âThe introduction of live facial recognition technology, which is already being used successfully by other forces in the UK, is a vital tool to help us to investigate crime thoroughly and relentlessly pursue criminals.
âWe meticulously planned the rollout of the technology to ensure our use is appropriate, proportionate, and that we are operating with transparency.
âAs part of this, we appropriately engaged with a wide variety of stakeholders and have ensured all information, documentation and policies are publicly available on our website.
âSince the launch on November 13, we have successfully completed a deployment in Redhill where officers arrested a 69-year-old man for breaching his sexual risk order and conducted condition checks for a sexual harm prevention order and a stalking protection order.
âOn a further deployment in Woking, a 29-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of rape and shoplifting and two women were issued community resolutions for shoplifting.
âWe appreciate that some people may have concerns about the technology, but it has been extensively tested by the National Physical Laboratory and the algorithm that we use shows no statistical bias towards gender or ethnicity (as tested nationally).
âWe have also committed to briefing officers before each deployment regarding any potential disparity to race, age, and gender, and will ensure there is extra corroboration before any action or engagement is taken.â
They added: âIt is our responsibility to use every tactic and innovation available to us to keep the public safe, deter criminal behaviour, protect people from harm, and locate the most serious of offenders â and the live facial recognition technology has helped us to do exactly that.â
Police and Crime Commissioner Lisa Townsend said: âI want to make sure our communities are as safe as possible for Surrey residents, which is why our police officers must have every tool at their disposal to track down criminals operating in our midst.
âI do understand that people may have concerns which is why it is important that the debate on policing technology reflects the facts, the safeguards in place and the clear benefits to public safety.
âThese vans will be used proportionately and it is important to stress that law-abiding members of the Surrey public going about their daily business have nothing to fear by their use.
âThe cameras will help our policing teams identify and detain those on a pre-determined watchlist such as violent criminals and sex offenders.â
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Frank Emery
December 4, 2025 at 6:02 pm
From the figures given, it means that at least 10 criminals were removed from the streets, a good result!
If you havenât anything to be afraid of, then what is your problem?
M Durant
December 5, 2025 at 12:14 pm
Facial recognition may help police in Surrey, but mistaken identity cases in London expose its flaws. The deeper problem isnât spotting offenders, itâs lenient sentencing and weak rehabilitation that let them reoffend.
Meanwhile, ordinary citizens face a loss of privacy, with police scans crossâchecked against massive passport and licence databases and no clear rules on data retention.
Technology alone wonât fix public safety without tougher justice and stronger long-term safeguards.
Dave Middleton
December 5, 2025 at 1:10 pm
I’m sure that if any of those councillors or their families were the victim of crime, they’d be more than happy if such technology were used to apprehend the offender.
As for my being randomly stopped in the street by police and asked to prove my identity and if needs be, my right to be at large in this country, I’m perfectly happy with that if it helps to get criminals, including (in no particular order), terrorists, rapists, burglars, vehicle thieves and paedophiles locked up and indeed, those who have no right to be in the country, swiftly removed.
Well done the police!
Barbara Ford
December 9, 2025 at 10:57 am
The other problem with all of this is the possibility that we in the future have a less delightful government than the present one – all the means of control of the population will be in place.