Fringe Box



‘County Deal’ is Not About a Unitary Authority, Says Surrey Council Leader

Published on: 26 Aug, 2021
Updated on: 26 Aug, 2021

Cllrs Tim Oliver and Eber Kington at loggerheads over a “county deal”.

By Julie Armstrong

local democracy reporter

Surrey has been put forward to pilot a “county deal” that would see its government structure completely change, but a council leader insists it’s not a plan for a new unitary authority.

In his “levelling up” speech last month, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said he wanted to give more powers to local government and invited county leaders to come forward with suggestions.

But a letter sent by Surrey County Council leader Tim Oliver to register interest earlier this month has caused some panic this may signal the return of last year’s much-criticised bid for a single countywide local authority replacing all others in the county.

According to Cllr Oliver (Con, Weybridge), this is not what the county deal is about.

Cllr Oliver said: “The unitary concept per se is not dead but it’s not something the county council is going to take forward, it’s not what we’re asking for.”

Opposition county councillors are unhappy that this letter – which says Surrey would like to be considered for a pilot “county deal” before the government’s levelling up white paper comes out in the autumn – was sent without their knowledge.

Councillor Eber Kington (RA, Ewell Court, Auriol & Cuddington) said: “This is not consensus politics. You get consensus by trusting people to know from the start.

“The fundamental point about democracy is that it’s open and transparent. We’re always playing catch-up.”

He said he thought Cllr Oliver should have made the direction of local government an election issue, adding: “That way voters could decide but he chose not to.”

The Residents Association and Independent group leader Nick Darby has written to Cllr Oliver on the group’s behalf, urging him to “involve the opposition, boroughs and districts, and the residents of Surrey in this process, every step of the way”.

Cllr Joss Bigmore

Guildford Borough Council leader Joss Bigmore, the new chair of the Surrey Leaders’ Group that represents Surrey’s 11 district and borough council leaders, said he recognised “every council has financial struggles” and thought the SCC leader’s initiative is a “positive step”.

He said: “We welcome the letter that Surrey wants a county deal.

“We’re very pleased to see his comments about working together with districts and boroughs. It is time to look forward.”

Cllr Will Forster

But the Liberal Democrat’s group leader Will Forster said he was disappointed. He said: “If there is going to be a county deal for Surrey, the process needs to be open, transparent and inclusive. The county council must learn its lesson from the failed unitary authority bid that cost around £250,000 and not repeat the same mistakes.”

Cllr Oliver told the LDRS: “With all due respect there was a very short timescale, and most of them are away. We are the administration.

“It was a benign letter simply registering an interest; what’s important is what we now put together and all members of the county council will be involved and hopefully districts and boroughs too.”

Along with others in the national County Councils Network which he chairs, he spoke on Monday (August 23) with MP Neil O’Brien, the prime minister’s “levelling up” adviser.

He said the meeting was about trying to get a better understanding of what the government is thinking, something he still does not have absolute clarity on. He said they want a “sensible geographical area and strong leadership but they haven’t been prescriptive”.

He said “we don’t know yet” what exactly a county deal means for Surrey, “It’s an iterative process”.

He would like to see the council’s partners, such as police, health and charities, getting together on a regular basis so their agendas align.

He is keen for Surrey to be one of the imminent pilot schemes and wants further devolved powers from central government in areas the county already has some responsibility, such as skills and transport and infrastructure.

The letter of August 10, to local government secretary Robert Jenrick, reads: “As you have made clear you are looking to work with those who share your ambition to remove complexity, reduce the cost of local government, and ensure financially sustainable models of delivery, through empowering strong local leaders and devolving power to local places and closer to citizens, with new County Deals. Surrey is well-placed and, as you will be aware, well-advanced to take full advantage of this approach.”

Asked what he meant by removing complexity, Cllr Oliver said it was about greater efficiencies, such as having a single waste contract. “And that’s where there will be a conversation with districts and boroughs,” he said.

“This is not a local government restructure or in any way subsuming district and borough’s powers. It’s, can we streamline, use economies of scale?

“Without impacting on the sovereignty of the districts and boroughs we’ve got to try to save money.”

Share This Post

Responses to ‘County Deal’ is Not About a Unitary Authority, Says Surrey Council Leader

  1. Barbara Ford Reply

    September 2, 2021 at 12:37 pm

    If this is indeed a way of having all Surrey’s boroughs and districts working together, as Joss Bigmore says, that is very good news for environmental initiatives, most of which need to be implemented on a larger scale that just one borough.

Leave a Comment

Please see our comments policy. All comments are moderated and may take time to appear.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *