Abraham Lincoln
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis...
Guildford news...
for Guildford people, brought to you by Guildford reporters - Guildford's own news service
In response to: Dragon Interview – Caroline Reeves Departing Lib Dem Councillor
Iâm prepared to believe the positive comments from readers about Cllr Caroline Reevesâ qualities but, having watched this interview, Iâm immensely relieved she is leaving.
When asked what she would change about the council, she said she canât really think of anything. But it seems her dissatisfaction with the public knows no bounds. They âlack understandingâ of the Local Plan, they âdonât seem to register or engageâ with issues, they donât know the difference between GBC and SCC, they are âonly interested when things go wrongâ, they are âobnoxious and hurtfulâ to councillors and guilty of âoutrageously bad behaviourâ.
I do remember a tiny street demo during the Local Plan process, and a certain amount of mild heckling at council meetings, but why is Cllr Reeves surprised? At the time, she was supposed to be leader of the opposition. But she supported, and says she still supports, the odious Local Plan, the Toriesâ flagship policy that is bringing misery to the borough.
Above all, however, I will remember Cllr Reeves for gratuitously co-sponsoring the Tory council leaderâs politically motivated complaint against GGG Cllr David Reeve. She says Cllr Reeve leaked a âconfidential document that shouldnât have gone out into the public domain”.
This is false: no such document ever existed. What Cllr Reeve did was produce a masterly analysis of data demonstrating that the Toriesâ Local Plan housing targets were inflated.
He accidentally included one statistic, allegedly protected by commercial confidentiality. Despite writing to Cllr Spooner to say that she didnât have the âbrain spaceâ to understand the analysis, she supported the complaint anyway.
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Jules Cranwell
March 14, 2021 at 7:17 am
A councillor who appears to have held residents in such contempt is unlikely to be missed.
To claim we are uninterested, do not register or engage with the local plan is an insult to those who have been very much engaged, and who she purported to represent. The huge support for three judicial reviews demonstrates this.