By Julie Armstrong
local democracy reporter
A skyscraper soon to be built in Woking that’s 13 storeys higher than Grenfell Tower was given planning permission with just one staircase.
Developer EcoWorld London has declined to say if it will change the design of its 37 storey tower planned for Goldsworth Road – despite Surrey’s farthest-reaching fire truck going up to just 20 storeys.
Labour councillor Mohammad Ali, whose Canalside ward includes the development site, told the LDRS: “It is most unfortunate.
“The developer has permission now. He’s not going to change the design and risk it coming back to planning.”
Planning permission was refused for different reasons in January 2021 – after concerned councillors were informed fire safety was not a planning consideration – but the applicant was given consent on appeal last month.
‘You’re going to make them run in panic down one staircase’
Cllr Ali said in the January 2021 planning committee meeting: “You’ve got one staircase, which means for anybody above 20 storeys, you have no way of getting them out.
“You’re going to make them run in panic down one staircase, 17 storeys.”
Currently, building regulations permit tall residential buildings to have a single staircase, as long as there is a ‘stay put’ strategy where the building is designed to prevent fires spreading between flats.
But in the Grenfell Tower tragedy of 2017 this compartmentation failed, allowing the fire to spread, and all residents and firefighters had to use the same one flight of stairs to escape.
See also: External Walls Survey Triggers Change in Emergency Evacuation Plan for Flats Above Town Centre Store
Surrey Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) was sent to respond as its truck-based at Leatherhead was the biggest at the time, reaching up to 42 metres, about 20 storeys.
Now London Fire Brigade (LFB) has bigger reach vehicles which can go up to 64 metres and could come to Surrey’s aid if needed.
But this is still only about 30 storeys, falling seven storeys short of what will be Woking’s highest tower.
Last month a developer planning just one fire escape staircase for a 35 storey skyscraper, about 400 metres from Grenfell Tower, said it would adapt its plans after LFB said it wasn’t happy.
The fire brigade told Hammersmith and Fulham council: “We do not believe that sufficient justification has been provided for the tall single-stair approach.”
Reacting to the original plans, a spokesperson for Grenfell United, which represents the survivors and bereaved, said: “After half a decade of campaigning for safer homes, it’s shocking to hear that a new tower block a stone’s throw from Grenfell, rigged with a fire safety defect before it’s even been built, is being planned.”
Last year some members of Woking’s planning committee felt uneasy that they were expected to give consent for Goldsworth Road despite their safety concerns.
In the meeting last January, councillor Melanie Whitehand (Con, Knaphill) said: “A lot of lives would have been saved if Grenfell had an extra staircase”, referring to it as “a death sentence”.
Planning officer Brooke Bougnague told them fire safety was a matter for building regulations after planning permission is given, which was the case at the time.
New planning requirements since then ensure high-rise developments consider fire safety at an earlier stage.
An applicant wanting planning permission for a building of seven or more storeys, or 18 metres, now has to submit a fire statement setting out fire safety considerations, and the council must consult the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) on fire safety before deciding the application.
But these requirements only came into force in August.
They followed the independent review of building regulations and fire safety prompted by Grenfell, which recommended that for higher-risk residential buildings, planning authorities should be required in law to consult the HSE and fire and rescue authorities, in the same way as they have to do with the Highways Authority and Environment Agency for example.
Unclear whether the design would be changed
EcoWorld London would not answer if it intends to change its design.
A spokesperson said: “The safety of our residents is our number one priority and throughout the planning process EcoWorld London has worked to ensure the scheme is in full accordance with all necessary and recommended guidelines.
“This has included formally consulting with Woking council building control and Surrey Fire and Rescue, who we will continue to consult with as the project continues.”
In 2020, SFRS told the planning authority it was neutral on the development but “the internal layout of some of the flats may not be compliant when it is submitted for building regulations approval, as the cooking facilities are too close to the means of escape, for example”, and it would make any additional comments at building control stage.
A spokesperson yesterday said: “Technically Gateway One (planning stage) is in place now because the necessary amendments have been made to the Town and Country Planning Act. We will start to be informed by HSE.
“This is now statutory so not something that can be overlooked.
“We are not able to say if we will have concerns on building regulations as they have not been submitted yet – if we have any concerns, we will make them clear and try to work with EcoWorld.
“Our legislative powers do not come into play until the building is occupied.”
The development will demolish the Woking Railway Athletic Club’s base and York Road Project’s day centre and provide both with new homes as well as 929 flats, set across five blocks with varying heights of between nine and 37 storeys.
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Bibhas Neogi
February 17, 2022 at 8:50 pm
This is sheer madness! How are the builders going to satisfy the Fire Risk Assessment when it is well known from recent incidents that a single staircase is totally inadequate to deal with evacuation of occupants above the reach of the Fire Brigade’s tallest equipment?
What is the point of Health and Safety rules and regulations if this is allowed to go ahead?
A sensible measure to curb this potentially unsafe height is for insurance companies to refuse to insure any occupiers on these higher floors. If insurers do not see sense, all those who are insured with these companies should consider moving their insurance cover in protest. This would force the builder to leave these floors without tenants should they proceed to build them anyway.
Ramsey Nagaty
February 21, 2022 at 10:03 pm
Will we ever learn.