Fringe Box

Socialize

Twitter

Letter: Local Government Reorganisation Must Strengthen Links Between Communities

Published on: 9 Apr, 2025
Updated on: 9 Apr, 2025

Tim Oliver – Conservative Leader of Surrey County Council

From Surrey County Council Leader Tim Oliver

We want better local government for Surrey.

We want to simplify the system, save money and most importantly strengthen connections between local communities and public services.

This is all in the context of the government’s plans to reorganise local councils across the whole country, removing the system of district councils and county councils, and replacing them with unitary councils responsible for all services.

This is happening in Surrey and it’s happening quickly, with final plans due to be submitted within weeks, and elections to the new councils in May next year.

While there are a number of different options for Surrey, the evidence suggests that two new unitary councils (splitting the county in half either east-west or north-south) would be the least disruptive option and save the most money.

It will create stronger and more sustainable councils, and combined with the right local engagement structures, will give Surrey a positive future.

While there is some discussion about the changes in local government in Surrey, the most important benefit of any change must be the strengthening of local community engagement.

How will you and your neighbourhood benefit? How can public services be tailored, shaped and prioritised in your community?

How will villages like Shalford or Worplesdon have their voice?

Whatever the size of your new council, we must ensure there is a strong, meaningful connection with the many different local communities we have in Surrey, understanding the different needs in each.

That’s why we’re proposing the creation of community-level boards all across Surrey. So you can have your say, engage with decision makers, get information and represent your area.

This should also include more than just your council. These boards should be the connection between you and the very local groups at your street, estate or village level, and the wider system of public service organisations.

They should include health partners, Surrey Police, larger voluntary groups, councillors, council staff who work in your area day-to-day, local Town and Parish Councils and Residents Associations.

The whole system can then properly understand the specific needs of Guildford, or Guildford’s villages, and the people who live there, and can focus local attention on the things that matter most and will have an impact in that place.

That connection between services is so important in making a real and lasting difference.

That’s why we need your input and that of our partners – true local engagement to shape the way you can get involved and have your say in all the services your local community needs.

We will soon launch a meaningful engagement exercise, giving residents and partners a real say in shaping Surrey’s future.

With this much more locally-connected and strategically-sustainable system, our communities will be stronger, healthier and thrive even more – as will your council.

Share This Post

Responses to Letter: Local Government Reorganisation Must Strengthen Links Between Communities

  1. Steve Grove Reply

    April 11, 2025 at 6:17 am

    Currently there are three levels of ‘local’ government: parish councils, which really have very little political clout, the local authorities (LAs), eg Guildford Borough Council, and then Surrey County Council, all doing their own ‘bit’ of governing: for example, bin collections by the LAs, and highways by SCC.

    The government’s proposal is to streamline ‘local’ democracy by the introduction of unitary authorities (UAs), doing away with two tiers of local government.

    So far, as I understand, the parish councils will remain, the boroughs and districts and SCC will be replaced with either two or three UAs and there will be a further tier of ‘local’ government above the UAs with a mayor hsving strategic control over certain aspects of government such as, I believe, transport and education.

    But the outcome remains the same: three levels of ‘local’ government.

    Now, Tim Oliver, leader of SCC, is proposing ‘community-level boards all across Surrey’.

    All this is supposed to streamline local democracy, make everything more efficient, save money and make everyone content.

    I shall be looking skywards to see the pigs fly.

    • Peta Malthouse Reply

      April 14, 2025 at 4:50 pm

      Surrey County Council is too big and remote. It is not interested in providing services to rural areas for retired people. Transport is cancelled, Park & Ride, changed street parking, all introduced with minimum consultation and no care. I am not impressed.

Leave a Comment

Please see our comments policy. All comments are moderated and may take time to appear. Full names, or at least initial and surname, must be given.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *