Fringe Box

Socialize

Twitter

University of Surrey Students Against Proposed Rules for Public Spaces

Published on: 6 Mar, 2025
Updated on: 7 Mar, 2025

A Public Spaces Protection Order notice issued in Guildford in 2022

By Emily Dalton

local democracy reporter

Surrey students have come out against Guildford’s draft rules about public spaces, saying they could be “detrimental” to local students. Under the borough council’s proposed new rules, students could be banned from being in a group of two or more people in the town centre which could “cause harassment, alarm or distress” to other people.

See also: GBC Seeks Views on Guildford Town Centre Public Spaces Protection Order

Guildford town centre has public space protection orders (PSPOs) aimed at tackling persistent anti-social behaviour affecting others. Introduced in 2022, the rules are now up for review. Boundaries for the PSPO cover the town centre, Stoke Park and some neighbouring residential roads, the Mount (residential area and green open space), including Black Cat Alley.

The draft Guildford PSPO Map 2025 (click on image to enlarge)

But students at the University of Surrey have attacked the draft regulations as “vague” and have said that they can be “misinterpreted” in a way that can be harmful to students in Guildford.

Leading the cause, the Student Union’s President Liam White said in a statement: “We are concerned by the overly conditional phrasing of ‘acting in a manner that is likely to cause’ and the vague nature of ‘distress’.

“This feels like an extremely broad scope to enforce, given that members of the public may potentially be ‘distressed’ when encountering young adults socialising in public, even if it is not disorderly or anti-social.”

Under a PSPO, individuals deemed to be breaching the order can be asked to change their behaviour by police officers, PCSOs, or GBC compliance officers. Fines and written warnings can be given for repeated breaches.

Mr White argued that the PSPO is not phrased in a way which prevents groups acting disorderly but instead relies purely on a member of the public claiming to be distressed or alarmed. He claimed this is unreasonable to potentially penalise members of the public, including students, in the town centre.

A spokesperson for Guildford Borough Council said: “We appreciate everyone who has taken time to respond to the Town Centre Public Spaces Protection Order consultation. These were draft proposals and the purpose of the consultation was to encourage feedback.

“In response to our partners and consultees, including the Student Union, we have adapted the proposed restrictions. The revised draft restrictions will be presented to the Executive on 27 March 2025 for consideration.”

Other key concerns raised included how “rowdy and inconsiderate behaviour” could be defined by someone’s clothing. The draft proposals state: “Wearing a piece of clothing with the intent to obscure or hide his/her identity for the purposes of committing crime and/or anti-social behaviour”.

The Student Union said this is particularly concerning for members of the community who wear clothing that covers their face or hair for religious purposes. “We question how appropriate it is to be enforcing restrictions on clothing, rather than other indicators of anti-social behaviour,” members said.

Students also criticised the proposed public space rules against the “anti-social” use of bicycles, skateboards and scooters in pedestrian areas. They said some of Guildford’s community is already resistant to the Beryl Bikes scheme and extending the PSPO will “disincentivise people from using sustainable travel”.

Share This Post

Responses to University of Surrey Students Against Proposed Rules for Public Spaces

  1. Dave Middleton Reply

    March 9, 2025 at 11:21 am

    Bearing in mind that most of the proposed conditions contained within the proposed PSPO mirror existing legislation, I really cannot see what their issue is.

    Particularly the student’s concerns regarding the use of bicycles, scooters and skate boards in pedestrian areas,bearing in mind that those modes of transport should not be used in such areas anyway…after all, the clue is in the word “pedestrian”.

Leave a Comment

Please see our comments policy. All comments are moderated and may take time to appear. Full names, or at least initial and surname, must be given.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *