Abraham Lincoln
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis...
Guildford news...
for Guildford people, brought to you by Guildford reporters - Guildford's own news service

Extinction Rebellion protesting against planning approval for oil production at Horse Hill. Image LDR.
By Chris Caulfield
local democracy reporter
The owners of a Surrey oil field have signed an agreement to âdeliver increased production and revenuesâ that will allow it to focus on its Dunsfold site.
Environmental campaigners, however, are still holding out hope the Supreme Court stops the drilling.
Uk Oil & Gas (UKOG) announced to shareholders that it was to âfarm outâ production at Horse Hill to the US-based Pennpetro Energy.
The Texas firm is to takeover 12 kilometres at the site, just north of Gatwick Airport, at a maximum cost of ÂŁ4.6m.
Announcing the tie up Stephen Sanderson UKOGâs chief executive said: âThis mutually advantageous transaction will inject new activity into Horse Hill, aiming squarely to deliver increased production and revenues from the oil field.
âThe farmout enables UKOG to move this asset forwards without the need to raise capital, enabling our resources to be firmly focussed upon the appraisal and development of the Loxley gas discovery, our most material petroleum asset.
âWe look forward to a close working relationship with Pennpetro and a mutually successful future at Horse Hill.â
UKOG refers to its holdings at Dunsfold as its Loxley site and hopes to drill for ÂŁ123 million of oil near the  Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty â pending its own High Court review.
Environmental campaigners who have been fighting against oil drilling at Horse Hill are still confident that the new companyâs involvement will not change things materially.
In June the Supreme Court will sit for a legal challenge against Surrey County Councilâs 2019 decision to grant planning for the four extra wells at Horse Hill. The same year the county also declared a climate emergency.
The application will go before the UKâs highest court after three judges were split in their findings â that the county councilâs decision to grant permission for 25 years of oil drilling and production was lawful.
According to UKOG the Horse Hill site has so far produced about 185,000 barrels of with approximately 1.4 million barrels still available.
Campaigner Sarah Finch of Redhill argues that the permission is out of touch amid the global climate crisis,
Sarah Finch said: âWe are taking legal action that is going through the Supreme Court in June.
âCurrently the planning is subject to a legal challenge. There is still a possibility that the Supreme Court will not give it the go ahead.
âThere has been low level production for a while there even though they got permission for expansion in 2019.
âI donât think this new companyâs involvement will change anything.â
Sarah started the campaign against the drill site on climate impact grounds -not just from the impact the drilling would have in the immediate area but the wider overall effect from burning the collected oil.
She added: âIt will take us away from keeping climate change within limits.
âHorse Hill will just make hitting those targets more difficult.
âIâve been concerned about climate change for a very long time and when a new oil well was proposed near my home I was horrified and we really needed to stop it going ahead.
âAnd itâs not just me, lots of residents have been involved.
âThere have been a series of planning applications for the site but these four new wells were agreed in 2019, such a huge ramp up. That is why I decided it needed a legal campaign.â
The Supreme Court is due to sit on June 21 after the Court of Appeal reached a split decision.
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Han Wachtel
March 31, 2023 at 9:21 am
With the government’s drive toward “Green” energy and addressing Climate Change, a project of this nature seems a little out of kilter with its stated aims.
If it remains serious about removing new petrol or diesel-powered vehicles in about 10 years, while also continuing to peddle Air Source Heat Pumps and Ground Source Heat Pumps, knowing they are not suitable for many UK properties, I can’t help but wonder if the left hand actually knows (or cares) what its right hand is doing?