Fringe Box



Investigations Start Into Tunsgate Arch Masonry Fall

Published on: 21 May, 2019
Updated on: 24 May, 2019

By Hugh Coakley

Investigations have started to establish the cause and the repair strategy for Tunsgate Arch after a piece of stone broke off from the structure on to the steps below on February 16 (2019).

Scaffolding erected under the arch in Tunsgate to allow engineers to inspect the structure.

Guildford Borough Council had cordoned off the area and had checked whether further spalling was likely. As a precautionary measure, a further section of stone was removed on Thursday, February 21 as it was revealed to be fractured as well.

The second stone was found to have non-ferrous pinning. The council believes that this was caused in 2004 during roof repairs and cleaning of the building. Both pieces of masonry at either end of a masonry beam appear to have suffered from compressive cracks.

Two sections of stone missing from the central section of Tunsgate arch. One had fallen from the arch and the other had been removed as a precautionary measure.

The investigation work is being carried out by Cooper & Withycombe, of North Street, Guildford, a firm of structural engineers and building surveyors

The lead consultants and the contractor for the repair work is Paye, specialists in stone repair work on historic structures.

The work is expected to be completed in August 2019.

Matthew Alexander.

Guildford’s honorary remembrancer Matthew Alexander summarises the history of Tunsgate, which is not just the arch…

“Tunsgate took its name from a long-vanished High Street inn called the Three Tuns. ‘Gate’ was the name given in Guildford to the alleyways that led off the High Street.

“The Three Tuns had been knocked down in 1818 to build a new corn market for Guildford’s flourishing grain trade. It had a frontage like a Roman temple of the Tuscan order, with the borough arms and “symbols of agricultural and civic prosperity” in the tympanum.

“The Tunsgate alleyway to Castle Square ran between the two left-hand columns. The corn market (or ‘corn exchange’) was also used as a courtroom when the assizes sat in Guildford; but not a very satisfactory one. The courts were moved to the County Hall in North Street in 1861.

“In 1901 the corn market was moved to Woodbridge Road, and the building was used as offices for Guildford Borough Council. In late 1936, it was partly demolished, leaving only the street frontage with its classical portico. The two middle columns were moved further apart and the steps removed to allow vehicles to drive from the High Street along Tunsgate, which had been widened.

“In the early 1980s the front steps were reinstated, so blocking it for through traffic. Now many Guildford people refer to the old archway as ‘Tunsgate’. In fact, it is the street that is Tunsgate: the archway is all that’s left of the old corn market, once an important part of the town’s commercial life.”

Further information on the arch was provided by a Guildford Borough Council spokesperson: “The Grade II listed structure has a Portland stone facade on a brick backing with ashlar stone inner walls and brick rear wall.

“The roof and soffit structures are in timber. In 1936 the front columns were moved apart and the rear arches rebuilt to form a roadway through the arch wide enough for motorised vehicles. This was achieved by inserting a composite steel beam spanning the repositioned inner columns to pick up the thrust from the relieving brick backing arches to the cornice stonework supporting the pediment.

“Steel rods are assumed to hang from the beam affixed to flat steel plates that pick up the load of the stonework spanning between the re-positioned inner columns.”

Share This Post

Responses to Investigations Start Into Tunsgate Arch Masonry Fall

  1. Colin Selvin Reply

    May 22, 2019 at 10:39 am

    I’m confused. Surely non-ferrous fixings are exactly what would be required. Expansion of ferric fixings upon rusting damages masonry.

    Also interesting to speculate what fixings of the stone beam would be fitted during “roof works”.

    Any more informed readers out there able to clarify, please?

Leave a Comment

Please see our comments policy. All comments are moderated and may take time to appear.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *