St Thomas of Canterbury’s School in Merrow. Google Street View
By Emily Dalton
Local Democracy Reporting Service
Highway safety fears have scuppered plans for a new Guildford preschool that parents say is needed to help children achieve academically.
St Thomas of Canterbury’s School in Merrow put forward plans to transform a 1960s caretaker’s bungalow into a preschool. Some parents argued the nursery would allow a smooth transition to primary school.
But the proposal was thrown out by members of Guildford Borough Council’s planning committee on June 18. Officers had recommended the scheme for refusal, arguing the significant benefits of providing early years’ schooling did not outweigh the massive highway safety risks.
Speaking against the application at the meeting, resident William Frankland said: “Horseshoe Lane West hasn’t seen flowing traffic for the last 30 years.” He added: “Even a small impact to traffic and parking will be detrimental.”
Councillors and speakers all said they supported the preschool idea in principle but could not fail to follow the Highways Authority’s advice.
Cllr Joss Bigmore
Cllr Joss Bigmore (R4GV, Merrow) said: “I’m desperate to approve this application … However, we cannot ignore the language of the Highways Authority. I’ve never seen it that strong.”
Members were shocked that Surrey Highways had slammed the scheme, with Cllr Maddy Redpath (R4GV, Castle) claiming she had only seen three highways objections in three years. Highway officers had condemned the plans as seeing an “unacceptable highway safety impact on the adjoining highway” for both drivers and pedestrians.
Council documents reveal the preschool could result in eight additional cars around the site at peak hours of 8-9am and 4-5pm. No extra parking spaces would be provided for the new nursery or on the wider school site.
Cllr Maddy Redpath
James Kibble, responsible for running the St Thomas of Canterbury’s School, said the majority of children attending the preschool would be from families already at the primary school so there would not be a huge traffic increase. But some members raised concerns that the starting and finishing times were different for each setting.
“It’s clearly a bad spot,” Cllr David Bilbe. “One vehicle, one movement, one accident, one child’s death.” The Conservative member for Normandy and Pirbright added: “I would urge everybody to think really hard about adding more vehicles in this situation.”
Cllr David Bilbe
Cllr Howard Smith
Cllr Howard Smith (Labour, Westborough) lambasted Surrey Highways for apparently not helping the school resolve the traffic issue and just criticising the plan.
“It shouldn’t be on the school to sort out these problems,” he said. “The school is there to educate the children, not sort out the road issue.”
Mr Kibble said traffic issues were a common problem with schools all over the country, but admitted: “I don’t believe we have investigated all the options.” He also claimed the school would be willing to pay for traffic measures like yellow lines.
Click on cartoon for Dragon story: Public Asked for Views on SCC’s Proposal for Reduced Speed Limits
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Wayne Smith
June 25, 2025 at 10:05 pm
Mr Kibble should already be aware that there are existing double yellow lines in Horseshoe Lane West. They are ignored by some parents parking at school pick-up and drop off times, including those that deem it acceptable to park on the yellow zig-zags outside of the school entrances!
It’s a similar situation along Boxgrove Lane and around the Boxgrove estate area caused by Boxgrove school parking, where parents even park on the white zig-zags at the zebra crossing (totally illegal) and fairly common in the evening/weekend with their swim sessions.
There is no parking enforcement by Surrey County Council at these schools, so what purpose would even more yellow lines achieve?