Abraham Lincoln
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis...
Guildford news...
for Guildford people, brought to you by Guildford reporters - Guildford's own news service
By Rebecca Curley
local democracy reporter
Council jargon is getting in the way of residents understanding the changes being made to services, councillors have warned.
The word “vulnerable” was an example given by councillors who said the term could apply to many different people at different times of their life.
The comment was made to Surrey County Council chief executive Joanna Killian by councillors as she and finance chiefs presented the feedback on the major consultation they undertook on the future of services such as libraries, community recycling centres and SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) provision.

Joanna Killian, the chief executive of Surrey County Council
Discussing how children centres will be re-modelled with 31 closing in a bid to meet the needs of the “most vulnerable” in “areas of deprivation” councillors said many residents did not see that has a good term to use.
Cllr Tim Hall, Conservative, said: “We are not communicating to them in a language they understand and vice versa.
“When we have a service change there does appear a difficulty to trying to communicate the policy change with the local service.”
Around 28,000 people across Surrey responded to the council’s consultation over the future of five major services.
But littered throughout the feedback reports presented to scrutiny was that many people did not understand what was being asked.
Cllr Richard Walsh, Conservative, told members of the corporate overview select committee on Friday (January 25) the word “vulnerable” was “nebulous”.
He said: “There is going to be a reduction in what we are doing in the perception to the public but we are not using words that are quantifiable.”
Ms Killian said as part of the consultation, which ended on January 4, she had held a number of one-to-ones with residents and community groups to explain certain aspects.
She said: “Sometimes you need to have very specific one-to-one conversations to get them to understand the enormity of the stuff we do. The more that we can talk to people about how to spend our money and where we spend our money – then asking people to make choices is less challenging for them.
“I think our weakness is communication and not consultation.”
Cabinet members voted on Tuesday (January 19, 2019) to accept recommendations to reduce the amount of children centres from 50 to 21 and to add nine satellite hubs and one mobile unit.
The papers will now go before all councillors at full council on Tuesday (February 5).
Common phrases/words found in Surrey County Council documents (compiled by LDR Rebecca Curley. Sourced from various Surrey County Council glossaries):

I'm living well for nothing at all! (See: No Trifling Matter: Magpie Trapped in Godalming Sainsbury’s)

Next stop, Debt Chasm! (See: We Should All Be Outraged About the Failure to Deal with Legacy Debt)
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
John Lomas
February 1, 2019 at 10:53 pm
“Children centres will be re-modelled with 31 closing in a bid to meet the needs of the ‘most vulnerable’ in ‘areas of deprivation'”.
This is an extremely positive message to those in the areas where the children centres are being closed. It is saying that, “This is not a deprived area. Your children are not vulnerable”
These messages will, in such an area, increase the sense of well-being for all its residents.
Is this a classic case of Orwellian Doublethink.