Abraham Lincoln
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis...
Guildford news...
for Guildford people, brought to you by Guildford reporters - Guildford's own news service
Guildford Labour Party
In what seems to be an endless process, the deadline has just passed on yet another iteration of the Local Plan.
But the Guildford Labour Party feels that once again, the draft plan shows that Guildford Borough Council’s ambition is limited and its vision sadly lacking. The document, lacking coherence, feels like a set of compromise.
The bottom line remains that we are in desperate need of housing, both social and private for the people of Guildford Borough. Nurses, police officers, teachers, retail workers, bus drivers and a raft of other professionals in average income jobs that support the borough’s struggle to find affordable accommodation within the town.
The plan talks much about “affordable housing” and while this includes social housing the plan does not identify social housing as a particular priority. Where the plan demands 40% affordable housing Guildford Labour Party would like to see the figure at raised to 50%, half the total.
As for student accommodation, we support purpose-built accommodation. The key thing is that student accommodation needs to be expanded beyond the University of Surrey to include other academic institutions such as Merrist Wood College, the Academy of Contemporary Music, Guildford School of Acting and the University of Law.
All the higher education institutions need to address the housing needs of their students.
Overall we should be considering house density, not the number of houses. We need to look at how many people live there, not how many houses we build. And we need to ensure that all houses are built to a good standard. Labour supports mandating the “Build for Life” standard for all houses.
When it comes to Guildford town centre, Labour would like to see far more support for small independent local businesses to maintain the heritage and distinctive character of Guildford. Labour also thinks that all measures for carbon reduction must apply equally across the board and no distinctions should be made between housing and retail.
And finally, public and community transport should be central to the Local Plan to alleviate congestion and minimise harmful emissions. At best. the draft plan pays lip service to these needs and shows no serious ambition to create extensive, safe cycling routes and take innovative approaches to encouraging greater use of buses.
George Dokimakis, chair of Guildford Constituency Labour Party commented: “The work done by the council on the plan is commendable but unfortunately it does not go far enough. So at best we can only raise only one cheer for the revised plan which seems to shy away from the sort of innovative and decisive policy ideas which Guildford desperately needs.”

And then there were seven. (See article: "Lib Dems Remain Puzzled By Leader’s Decision to Sack Executive Member")
srsltid=AfmBOoqVq7rNYi0X3u8Dhcv_Gwb2G2t4E4OXZJASA1-0LcD4R2puhgj4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">

This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Jim Allen
July 30, 2017 at 2:51 pm
While my political leanings are not normally towards the left – Brian Creese has got a point!
Jules Cranwell
July 30, 2017 at 5:04 pm
If anything the LP is over ambitious, at least in terms of how many homes GBC plans to dump in the green belt and the 50,000 additional cars this will bring to our already gridlocked roads.
Bibhas Neogi
July 31, 2017 at 11:09 am
The problem is that spending on roads is a small proportion of revenues collected from fuel duties, road taxes, insurance taxes and VAT. If anyone is responsible for woeful planning and investment it is the central government.
While pressure comes from one department urging councils to build more houses, the Department for Transport seems oblivious to the needs of expanding and improving the local networks.
Other untimely urgency has been put on HS2 costing billions when funding at this time should be for roads and existing rail network. The system of funding needs a radical change.