A generous pinch of bitterness seems to have been included in the recipe for Shrove Tuesday’s charity pancake race in the High Street, causing a pre-election spat and talk of a formal complaint to the Charity Commission.
With the political temperature rising as the borough election campaign begins to bubble, two of the established parties are questioning the new Residents for Guildford and Villages (R4GV) group’s “politicisation” of the event. The group had displayed banners at the finish line and handed out leaflets promoting their policies.
The annual fun race, organised by the Charlotteville Jubilee Trust and compered this year, once again, by Peter Gordon of Eagle Radio, raises money for selected charities. Guildford Borough Council (GBC) are said to provide licensing support and facilities at a special charity rate and “match-fund” money, this year raised for the Mayoral charity, Young Carers. The Mayor of Guildford, Cllr Mike Parsons was said to have been “embarrassed” by the political activity.
Council Leader Paul Spooner said: “I am extremely disappointed at the politicisation of the excellent and very well supported annual Pancake Race. There is a time and place for electioneering and it was definitely not appropriate for campaigning, distributing political literature and the display of political banners at this community event.
“There is a world of difference between attendance and support by politicians and active campaigning. In my opinion, R4GV overstepped the mark in every way.”
GBC’s monitoring officer, as “head of legal”, is said to be taking up the complaints directly with the race organiser on behalf of the council. One GBC source told The Dragon there was no desire to see the Charity Commission issue a sanction preventing the event next year and that could be avoided if the organisers issued a statement admitting a mistake was made in promoting a political cause at the race.
John Redpath, who has organised the event for many years, is also standing as an Independent candidate under the R4GV umbrella in the May 2 election. Writing as the general manager of Charlotteville Jubilee Trust, he said: “It is sad that Cllr Spooner is using his position as council leader to do down a local charity, very sad.
“As pancake race organiser this year, I had to consider the request of a new residents’ group (R4GV) who wished to help with sponsorship. I was aware this group were challenging the elected members of the borough council on a number of issues and therefore had to make the following key considerations:
1. Is R4GV a political party registered with the Electoral Commission (EC)? [My conclusion] No, they’re not. They’re just a group of concerned residents.
2. Do they have any political candidates registered with GBC for the up and coming elections? [My conclusion] No, they don’t.
“If the answer to either of the above had been yes then their request to sponsor would have been refused as this may well infringe both Charity Commission and EC rules/guidelines, but I’m no expert.”
Caroline Reeves, leader of the Lib Dems at GBC, said: “I didn’t see the pancake races because I was at a meeting with a local charity.
“I think it’s accepted practice that when councillors attend any general charity or fundraising event they put aside [party] politics of any colour or description, especially if it’s the Mayor’s charity.
“I think it’s very unfortunate if anything that happened at the pancake races went against this basic understanding. Being a councillor isn’t all about politics.”
The event is reported to have raised around £1,500, after GBC’s match-funding.
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Angela Gunning
March 7, 2019 at 2:35 pm
I was not present either at the Pancake races – busy elsewhere, unfortunately. I agree with my colleagues Cllrs Reeves and Spooner; using this community fund-raising event for political campaigning was inappropriate and ill-judged.
Angela Gunning is the Labour group leader at GBC and borough councillor for Stoke.
David Roberts
March 7, 2019 at 2:54 pm
I see a glittering future for cross-party politics in Guildford.
Since those otherwise invisible men, Cllrs Walsh (Lab) and Jackson (Con), already seem to have formed a politicians’ trade union to attack blameless members of the public [see Letter: This Whole Sorry Episode Smacks of Unfairness], why don’t Cllrs Spooner (Con) and Reeves (Lib Dem) join them?
Just think: they could usher in a new era for the council in which public scrutiny and political campaigning are banished forever. Goodbye at last to the “bloody rabble”, with which Cllr Moseley (Con) compared the public gallery.
Gordon Bridger
March 8, 2019 at 7:36 pm
If I recall correctly Anne Milton was making pancakes at the last Charity race – did anyone object? Of course not.
To the shame of the council, this pancake race has been organised by John Redpath and volunteers for years, a huge task which the council should be doing everything to promote. In previous years, the charity has had to pay £150 for use of the Guildhall which entails no additional cost to the council and comes from funds which should go to a cancer charity. How mean can one get?
All charities should get free use of the Guildhall which like Burchatts Barn is too expensive to use and is instead rented out as a shop.
What a way to run a council.
Gina Redpath
March 8, 2019 at 8:01 pm
It is all so silly it is only a flippin’ pancake race – lots of people, lots of fun for all.
Please stop scoring political points from this tiny charity – we are all volunteers and doing our best for the good people of Guildford.
Ben Paton
March 13, 2019 at 5:45 pm
It is pretty rich that the leader of the council considers it part of his role to be the arbiter of political correctness for the borough. Is that yet another of his many titles? Nobody appointed him to that role.
It is not part of his job description. Who is the council to tell anyone off? It does not apply its own Code of Conduct, it does not engage in proper separation of duties, and it doesn’t do any serious scrutiny. Far from being a paragon of proper and apolitical service to the community, it is a deeply politicised body that shamelessly uses its majority to oppress minority groups.
Anyone who dares criticise the council is immediately the butt of aggressive attacks on their conduct. As others have pointed out, it is high time it turned a critical eye on itself instead of finding fault with anyone who dares to disagree.