Abraham Lincoln
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis...
Guildford news...
for Guildford people, brought to you by Guildford reporters - Guildford's own news service
By Emily Dalton
local democracy reporter
Plans that would see mental health services being run from an office building in a Guildford residential area have been approved despite concerns over âunacceptableâ noise.
Some neighbours objected to the application in fear there would be disturbance from people in “emotional” or mental distress.
Oakleaf Enterprise, a mental health charity based in Guildford, offers services designed to meet community needs and help people manage their mental health. After its former home became dilapidated, the charity found Turret House, on Jenner Road, a modern premise to operate from.
Clive Stone, chief executive of Oakleaf, said: âSince Covid weâve seen a sharp rise in people needing our help â these people are just like you and me. Individuals who simply need just a little extra support to maintain an otherwise normal life, while coping with challenges such as anxiety, loneliness and lack of confidence.â
The building sits on the corner of Jenner Road and Epsom Road, near the Upper High Street in Guildford. The application proposed changing the restrictions that require the building be used only as an office, to allow for broader and more flexible usage including counselling services. The majority of the office space (around 72 per cent) will remain in its current usage of providing employment opportunities.
Members of Guildford Borough Councilâs Planning Committee voted overwhelmingly in favour of the application on January 29. Officers and councillors agreed the public benefits of improved mental health services âoutweighedâ the partial loss of office space.
Planning documents read: âThe wellbeing partnership is operating in partnership with the NHS and will operate between 6pm-11pm as a county-wide funded support service for people experiencing mental health crisis or emotional distress on a 1-2-1 basis.â On an average evening, the report said, two or three clients would attend with very few staying until 11pm.
But more than 30 objections were sent to the council, opposing the plans on the grounds of noise, privacy, traffic concerns and incompatibility with residential character of the area.
âIt is disappointing that some of the objections raised against our planning application appear insular and in some cases reflect unfounded fears of people living with mental ill health,â Mr Stone told the committee. âSuch attitudes do a disservice to the community and the compassion we work to foster.â
Operating hours were the main concern for residents, of which most were reportedly families and elderly residents in a calm part of town. Objectors said they âwould like to go to bed in peace by 9pmâ.
âThis is where we live,â said neighbours, opposing the plans for a mental health support service near them. They stressed the office hours were fine but âvisiting members of the publicâ until 11pm was âunacceptableâ. One person said: âThe elderly are vulnerable too and we must balance the rights against these potential service users.â
Some residents commenting on the application were significantly concerned the charity service offered support on a non-appointment basis, welcoming clients experiencing mental health crises or emotional distress until 11pm, 365 days a year. One person said: âThe unpredictable nature of the clienteleâs behaviour could potentially disrupt the peaceful environment of Jenner Road, affecting the sense of security among residents.â
Concerns were also raised over a potential loss of privacy as clients visiting Oakleaf in the evening may overlook the adjacent windows and lit rooms in the evenings. Other residents said they worried about people âhanging aroundâ the streets late at night.
With the area also including nearby restaurants and estate agents, councillors said the area is not âconventionallyâ residential and so considered the residentsâ arguments as âfalling by the waysideâ.
Cllr Richard Mills (Con, Castle) said there are two other mental health facilities in the area for âdisturbedâ clients, but the Oakleaf will support people with âtemporary depressive illnessesâ and so is unlikely to cause a nuisance in the area.
Addressing residentsâ remarks, the applicant promised smoking on site would be prohibited, only staff would be allowed to use the car park, clients would not access or leave the building by the car park and the courtyard would not be used after 8pm. Parking was also raised as a concern, so officers conditioned the applicant to create a travel plan.
This website is published by The Guildford Dragon NEWS
Contact: Martin Giles mgilesdragon@gmail.com
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes
Jim Allen
January 31, 2025 at 8:19 pm
I think any objectors should look at them selves and ask! What would I do if my partner left me?
10 per cent of all ages and specific groups suffer mental crisis, bullying, anxieties, depression, prolonged duress stress disorder, bullying in the work place, post natal depression. It’s part of life.
Every one is an invisible health problem.
Would those objecting you want to enter a building, lit up like Blackpool, saying “residents here are struggling mentally”? Shouldn’t we prefer a discreet former office building such as the one in question?
We might all need help for mental illness at some stage.