Fringe Box

Socialize

Twitter

Devolution: Ministry Asks for Clarification of How £5 billion Debt Will Be Managed

Published on: 29 Apr, 2025
Updated on: 12 May, 2025

By Chris Caulfield

local democracy reporter

Billions of pounds in crushing debt could force Surrey and its boroughs and districts to become a single mega council – potentially merged with a neighbour, following government feedback on its devolution and reorganisation plans.

Two plans were submitted in March over how to dissolve local government in the county and create a new streamlined system.

The county council and three of the 11 boroughs and districts favoured splitting Surrey into two unitary authorities while the majority of the boroughs and districts favoured three. Both would have an overarching and directly elected mayor. Several councils are worried about being financially “punished” if it is grouped with debt-ridden neighbours.

Now, those plans could all be for nothing if they are unable to demonstrate how to deal with the more than £5 billion of debt owed  – and in particular £2.6 billion from bankrupt Woking Borough Council and £1 billion at Spelthorne where government commissioners have recently been appointed to take over.

The letter from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government was sent to all chief executives of Surrey’s boroughs, districts and county council, in reply to the councils’ plans.

It read: “The county and district co-authored plan shows that greater efficiencies are available where there is less disaggregation, with the single unitary enabling the greatest efficiency that could benefit the management of local debt.

“Given the scale of the financial challenges facing Surrey, we would welcome further detail on how the ability to manage debt compares in each of the different options.

“As the long-term financial sustainability of the three unitary option seems most challenging in this context, we will need more information on how you will manage the risks of disaggregation to meet the financial sustainability criteria as well as the approach to debt management.”

“We suggest meeting to discuss in more detail local proposals for managing debt.”

The ministry said that if Surrey was to shift towards a single unitary model, unlocking devolution would mean partnering up with neighbouring authorities or joining a neighbouring mayoral authority.”

To achieve this, the area will need to ensure the proposed devolution geography meets the criteria set out in the English Devolution White Paper.

A Surrey-only devolution would only work, it added, under the two or three unitary council proposals  “subject to achieving sensible population ratios between unitaries”.

The ministry also specifically asked for evidence on how any new merged authority  “would enable financially viable councils, including identifying which option best delivers value for money for council tax payers”.

It added; “We note the desire for clarity and further discussions around the area’s debt position and your preferred option for Government to write off the current estimated debt of £1.5 billion.”

Woking  Borough Council is short £1.5 billion  – once all its assets are accounted for.

It continues: “The default position is that assets and liabilities remain locally managed by councils, but we acknowledge that there are exceptional circumstances where there has been failure linked to capital practices.

“Where that is the case, proposals should reflect the extent to which the implications of this can be managed locally, including as part of efficiencies possible through reorganisation.

“Commissioners should be engaged in these discussions.

“It would be helpful to see further detail in proposals on the projected financial sustainability of proposed unitaries and how they could manage debt locally.”

Share This Post

Responses to Devolution: Ministry Asks for Clarification of How £5 billion Debt Will Be Managed

  1. Jim Allen Reply

    April 29, 2025 at 7:04 pm

    So let’s spell this out: “devolution” means Democracy is “just” delayed until 2026 sorry 2027 or later.

    The triple divide of Surrey bringing government closer, is now a join with possibly Sussex or Hampshire to cover the debt.. so instead of moving closer to the people.. all local government will be devolved and joined to other counties

    People of Surrey ever felt, “You been had”?

  2. Peter Hyde Reply

    April 30, 2025 at 7:55 am

    It seems that the only thing that matters is cost. Any pretence that real local democracy is important is gone. The Government should perhaps abolish local councils completely and appoint area commissioners.

  3. J Heaphy Reply

    April 30, 2025 at 9:17 am

    The debt was always going to be “the” big issue.

    So why is this only being discussed now?

  4. Susan Fox Reply

    April 30, 2025 at 3:43 pm

    This is not democracy given we’ve been denied a vote, the people who should fund the debt are those who went and voted for the delay.

    The same crew, the majority party together with others at County Hall, denied us a vote. I suggest they sell off County Hall and give their services for free until they’re abolished. There are plenty of town halls around Surrey; they could rotate and actually meet the electorate.

  5. Frank Emery Reply

    April 30, 2025 at 5:03 pm

    English Devolution White Paper, foreword by the Deputy Prime Minister, why would you believe a word she says?

  6. Nigel Keane Reply

    April 30, 2025 at 9:57 pm

    I think Peter Hyde would have been more accurate if he had said ‘Area Commissars’. In Guildford we rejected the idea of a all powerful mayor as just a big con. We only have to look at London to see the result there.

    The debt owed by Woking and Spelthorne must not be thrust upon the rest of Surrey just to help Angela Rayner’s vanity project, instead these two councils should have to clear the debt themselves before being allowed to join the rest of Surrey in what ever type of council we have imposed upon us.

    We do not need it nor do most of us want it, there is no democracy in the plan.

    I would hope that the next Government, which I would doubt will be run by Labour, would reverse the smoke and mirrors approach used so far.

    The old saying, ‘If it Ain’t broke don’t fix it’ has never been accepted by modern parties of any persuasion who always think they have a bright idea from selling off our water to allowing cowboy investors to take over electricity and gas, stopping local councils from building genuinely affordable rental housing and even going as far as having British Passports printed in France!

Leave a Comment

Please see our comments policy. All comments are moderated and may take time to appear. Full names, or at least initial and surname, must be given.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *